The PSE UK project identifies people falling below what the public thinks is a minimum standard of living. This consensual approach was first used in 1983 and has been repeated several times since. The 2012 results show that in Britain:
The Poverty and Social Exclusion (PSE) project identifies those who fall below what the public sets as a minimum standard of living. It first establishes what the population as a whole think this standard should include by identifying what most people think are necessities for living in society today.
It then looks directly at people’s living standards to find out who lacks these necessities and so falls below this minimum standard.
The 1983 Breadline Britain survey pioneered this approach. It was used again in 1990, 1999 in Britain, in 2002/3 in Northern Ireland and in the latest PSE: UK 2012 research. This means we can track changes over the last 30 years.
NB: the 2012 survey covers the UK but the 1983, 1990 and 1999 surveys did not include Northern Ireland. All figures in this ‘Facts and Findings’ are for Britain only.
Looking at those who lack three or more of the items and activities seen as necessities at that time, the percentage of households who fall below society’s minimum standard has doubled over the last 30 years.
This level of multiple deprivation affects people’s whole way of life. It closely matches people’s own self-perception of poverty. In 1983, 84% of those lacking three or more necessities felt they were poor all or some of the time and, in the 2012 survey, 71% of those lacking three or more necessities thought they were poor all or some of the time.
This is rise in the proportions of multiply deprived households is all the more significant because:
The 1999 study was the first of the four to look at child poverty in detail. It showed how many families could not afford the minimum living standards for children set by society as a whole.
There has been a surprising increase since 1999 in the numbers of children who are multiply deprived. The numbers of children who lack two or more necessities has risen from 2 million children in 1999 to almost 4 million today. This suggests that families have fared very badly during the current recession as, from other measures, we know that child deprivation fell between 1999 and 2006/07. This rise is all the more striking as there has been a slight tightening in attitudes to necessities since 1999, see Facts and Findings 3: What do we think we need.
The four surveys look at a wide range of items, material and social.
A damp-free home and heating to keep living areas warm have been the top two necessities in all four surveys.
Around 95% agree these items are necessities in each survey. But more households today lack these basics than in 1983 or in the 1990s (see Figure 2.2).
The proportions going without both first fell and then rose. So, while things improved in the 1990s, there has been a sharp decline since.
The sharp rise in fuel costs since the early 2000s partly explains why heating is harder to afford. The costs of fuel and light have more than doubled since 2000, up by 234%. The overall rise in consumer prices has been much lower, 134%.
Being able to keep your home in a decent state of decoration is also seen as a necessity and the numbers unable to afford to do this are also up from 15% of adults in the 1990s to 20% today.
Taking all three housing necessities; heating, damp free home and adequate decoration (all seen as necessities in 1990, 1999 and 2012), today 13 million people (aged 16 and over) live in inadequate housing conditions that's around 3 million more people live than in the 1990s.
Overcrowding is also back at the levels found in 1983. The percentage of household who cannot afford enough bedrooms for every child of a different sex aged 10 or over to have their own bedroom has risen sharply since 1999 (see Figure 2.2).
People are finding it harder to afford key aspects of diet today than they did in 1999, though there has been a small overall improvement since the 1980s (see Table 2.1). All these three items of food are seen as necessities by large majorities of people.
|Food necessities for adults||1983||1990||1999||2012|
|Two meals a day||4%||1%||(1)%||3%|
|Meat, fish or vegetarian equivalent every other day||8%||3%||2%||5%|
|Fresh fruit and vegetables||n/a||6%||5%||7%|
People continue to face problems in feeding themselves properly partly because, like fuel prices, food prices have risen faster than inflation since 2000.
Looking across all the adult food necessities, around 4 million are not properly fed by today’s standards, which is a similar number to those who were not properly fed in 1999 by the standards of that year (which also included a roast joint or its vegetarian equivalent once a week as well as the above items). This is an improvement on the overall picture in 1990 and 1983 when, by the standards set then, 5 million adults and 5.5 million could not afford one of the food items then seen to be necessities.
There have also been some improvements for children since 1983. There is one food necessity for children common to 1983 and 2012, namely having three meals a day. In 1983 nearly half a million children missed out because their parents were so short of money. Today, there are far fewer children missing out with too few cases to make a reliable estimate. The percentages unable to afford other basic food essentials for children has been investigated since 1999 and shows little change since 1999. This suggests that families are trying to put children’s food first.
The numbers of children missing out on other necessities are rising. Children today are more likely than in 1999 to have to go without items of clothing seen as essential for all children, with the exception of a warm winter coat which few children today lack:
Other changes suggest that families are cutting back even more on some necessities, in particular leisure and social activities, to afford the basics. The numbers of children unable to participate in a range of activities because their families can't afford it has risen since 1999, in some cases more than doubling (see Figure 2.3).
In the current tough economic climate, people have a less generous view of what the essential social activities should be than they held in 1999, see Facts and Findings 3: What do we think we need? In the 2012 survey the social activities, seen to be necessities by the majority, are a hobby, celebrations on special occasions, attending wedding and funerals and similar occasions, being able to make hospital or other such visits and being able to take part in sport and exercise. In 1999, activities seen as essential also included presents for the family once a year, having family or friends round once a month and a holiday away from home for a week once a year. Taking part in sport and exercise, now seen as a necessity, was not asked in 1999.
Even so, 3.5 million more people are missing out today on social activities based on this less generous view than missed out in 1999 on the more generous view held then: 11 million today compared to 7.5 million in 1999. Using 1999 standards, 16 million people today miss out on social activties.
The necessities that people most struggle with are those related to financial security and the ability to deal with emergencies. The percentages who can't afford these items are the largest and are among those which show the sharpest rises. Households in 2012 are less able to cope with unexpected events or afford minimal levels of financial protection than in 1999 (see Table 2.2).
|Replace or repair broken electrical goods||12%||26%|
|Household contents insurance||10%||12%|
|Regular savings for rainy days||27%||32%|
The PSE approach measures poverty against what the population as a whole says are necessities. This changes over time PSE Facts and Findings 3: What do we think we need?. Many consumer goods have become relatively cheaper over the thirty years and more people can afford them. These items become embedded in our lives until the point where to go without them is to miss out. Some items not chosen as necessities in 1983, such as a telephone, have come to be seen as essential. And some which are now central to our lives, such as a computer with internet access for children, were not even a part of them in 1983. Those who can’t afford these items today are now included in the PSE count of poverty numbers, though they would not have been in the past.
These changing patterns of necessities and expectations add to the overall pressures on the budgets of the poorest households.
Everybody is taking a step back instead of forward
Underlying these trends lies a growing income divide. Over the last 30 years, Britain has become increasingly unequal. The size of the economy has doubled. But the fruits of growth have been increasingly captured by those on the highest incomes, leaving those on middle and low incomes further and further behind. Households dependent on low wages have increasingly found their pay packets squeezed and their jobs insecure. Since the millennium, incomes have risen even more slowly.
Although real incomes at the bottom initially rose during the crisis of 2008-9, they have fallen sharply since 2009-10. This is largely because wage rises have been falling behind inflation. As a result, low-income households are little better off today than in 1999, on average (after allowing for inflation).
The UK’s faltering economic prospects have also had an impact on the public’s view of minimum standards. The 2012 standard is in some respects less generous than in 1999. Some 1999 necessities have dropped out of the list, see PSE Facts and Findings 3: What do we think we need?.
The main reason more people live in poverty today than in the 1980s is that the lower your income, the slower your income has grown over the last 30 years. As a result, increasing numbers of people have found that their living standards have not kept up with the changing standards of society.
These results reflect the situation before the majority of proposed benefit changes come into place and before benefits payments are revised to increase at less than the level of inflation. The impact of the current government austerity measures is set to hit hard those whose standard of living is already well below that seen by a majority to be minimal.
The first PSE UK tables of data are available in the 'Explore the data' section.
The PSE:UK 2012 research draws on two surveys both carried out by the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) in Britain and by the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA) in Northern Ireland.
Read more about the research approach here.
See also the PSE: UK team's first report 'The impoverishment of the UK'.